​​​​​​​

MESSAGE BOARD

THE CHALLENGE COMMUNITY, ON-LINE!

FRIENDLY ASSISTANCE AND ENCOURAGEMENT AVAILABLE FOR CHALLENGERS OLD AND NEW,

FROM FRIENDLY AND ENCOURAGING CHALLENGERS, NEW AND OLD

PLEASE USE YOUR OWN NAME WHEN POSTING. THANK YOU!

Download route sheets, admin forms, event documents here

Any queries? Email the coordinators  Sue, Ali & Mick at tgochallenge@gmail.com 

The TGO Challenge Message Board
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: Accuracy of OS Maps total ascent data?

I am getting a slight feeling of deja vu.

Re: Accuracy of OS Maps total ascent data?

Indeed Emma - it's déja vu all over again! :upside_down_face:

But this is a favourite old chestnut, so let's not spoil the fun. For completeness I'll add to the posts above by repeating my own observation regarding graphic representations on maps with regard to ascent figures - from my blog way back in 2008!

The big problem seems to be with roads, tracks and paths. Any road on the map is merely a graphic, scaling at maybe 30 m wide on a 1:50,000, and, crucially, unconnected to the height data. This is why, on Memory Map, the occupants of the cottage near Braemar at NO127909 are apparently faced with the problem of the opposite side of the road being 16 metres (52 ft) higher than it is outside the house (must be a problem backing the car out of the garage!).

Thus any route plotted along this road, if it deviates slightly from one side to the other, will record 16 metres of additional ascent at this point alone - and along its length these errors will add up to a great deal.

Zoom in on Memory Map and pick any land rover track contouring around a hill, between contours. Using a paper map, we will say that the ascent here is zero, and so it is. But check the height on the left and right hand sides of the track, and you will find that it often apparently slopes by as much as 3m or 4m. The same applies to canals - sloping water!

When we plot a route we might stay within the confines of a road or track, but it is simply not possible to get an accurate ascent figure whilst the software is incapable of recognising that a track or road is (mostly) flat from side to side.

That said, our 'paper' method does not take account of undulations along the track that do not break the contour line. However, I reckon that any underestimation that this might produce is relatively insignificant.

One for the boffins to work on, but for now ..... count those contours!!!


Plus ça change and all that.

Happy New Year - although it's probably just a repeat of the old one. :wink:

Re: Accuracy of OS Maps total ascent data?

Hi Phil,

I certainly have no wish to spoil such innocent fun – and with all the boys and girls playing together so nicely. I think I have seen that house outside Braemar. I wondered why they were parking on the road.

2018 does seem to have a lot in common with 2017 (it is raining in a very similar way), but I feel it is going to be much better. Happy New Year to all! :champagne: